Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613730›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Assessing the Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Hip Fracture Management: A Systematic Review.

Mushtaq Ahmed, Mahnoor Qureshi, Mohammad M Khan, Irfan Ullah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mushtaq AhmedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Steeton, GBR.
Mahnoor QureshiEmergency Medicine, Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, GBR.
Mohammad M KhanMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Irfan UllahEmergency Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fractures often lead to significant blood loss and transfusion requirements in the older population. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used to control bleeding, but its optimal dose, timing, and broader clinical benefits remain unclear. A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Ovid-EMBASE, and EBSCOhost was performed for studies published between 2019 and 2024. Eligible studies included adults with traumatic hip fractures (intra- or extracapsular) treated with TXA. In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses. Findings were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes. TXA consistently reduced intraoperative and postoperative blood loss and lowered transfusion needs, with reductions up to 46% compared with controls. Across various dosing strategies, i.e., preoperative, divided doses, or topical, no significant increase in thromboembolic complications was reported. Limited but favourable evidence suggested improvements in pain, functional recovery, and hospital stay. Benefits appeared more pronounced in extracapsular fractures, where hidden blood loss is typically greater. TXA is a safe and effective adjunct in hip fracture surgery, significantly reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements without increasing the risk of thromboembolism. Standardised dosing protocols are needed, and further research should focus on long-term recovery and tailoring treatment to the type of fracture and patient characteristics.

Indexed as

blood transfusion needdosage regimenpatient-centred outcometranexemic acidtraumatic hip fracture

Identifiers

PMID41613730
PMCPMC12851818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.