ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Microplastic Exposure on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal Bloating in the Modern Era: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Environmental Contributors.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Article
- Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Human Diet: Sources of Exposure, Bioavailability, Toxicokinetics, and Systemic Health Effects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (≤5 mm) are increasingly recognized as pervasive environmental pollutants with potential implications for human health. Human exposure occurs primarily through ingestion and inhalation, with limited evidence also suggesting dermal contact. Microplastics have been detected in human blood, placental tissue, and gastrointestinal samples, indicating systemic exposure. Proposed biological pathways include oxidative stress, inflammation, endocrine disruption, and alterations in the gut microbiota; however, direct evidence linking these mechanisms to adverse health outcomes in humans remains limited. This systematic review synthesizes human-based evidence to evaluate health outcomes associated with microplastic exposure. The review includes primary human studies, specifically observational studies and clinical trials, as well as human-focused systematic reviews. Animal and in vitro studies were excluded from outcome synthesis because they do not directly reflect human clinical effects. Mechanistic insights derived from non-human experimental studies were included only to provide biological context and were clearly separated from human outcome data to avoid over-interpretation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 2010 and May 2025. Primary human studies constituted the core evidence base for data extraction, qualitative synthesis, and certainty of evidence assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework. Systematic reviews were evaluated at the review level only using AMSTAR-2 to assess methodological quality, examine consistency or discordance in reported associations, and identify evidence gaps. These reviews were not decomposed into their constituent primary studies to prevent duplication. In total, 30 articles were included, comprising 22 observational studies, five clinical trials, and three systematic reviews. Across included studies, inflammatory biomarkers (CRP (C-reactive protein), IL-6, TNF-α), endocrine markers (thyroid hormones, cortisol), and oxidative stress indicators (8-OHdG, MDA (malondialdehyde)) were frequently reported. These findings represent recurrent statistical associations and convergent qualitative trends identified through structured narrative synthesis, rather than evidence of biological causation. Evidence related to neurocognitive outcomes and chronic diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease, was limited and inconsistent. Methodological heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis, necessitating an organized qualitative synthesis. Overall, evidence certainty was moderate for inflammatory and endocrine biomarkers but low for neurocognitive and chronic disease outcomes. Overall, current human evidence suggests associative links between microplastic exposure and biological markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and endocrine alteration. However, causal relationships with specific clinical diseases remain unestablished, underscoring the need for standardized biomarkers, longitudinal cohort studies, and interdisciplinary research to clarify long-term health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.