ReviewCureus2025
Advancing Nursing Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Readiness Among Clinical Nurses: A Latent Profile Analysis With Implications for Nursing Management.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored within nursing practice, education, and workforce-related contexts; however, the scope and strength of the supporting evidence remain variable. This systematic review aimed to synthesize empirical evidence on AI-driven interventions in nursing and to examine their reported associations with clinical, educational, and workforce outcomes. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL was conducted for peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 2018 and August 2025. Eligible studies examined AI-based interventions applied in nursing practice, nursing education, or nursing workforce settings. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and retrospective evaluations; non-empirical sources were used only to contextualize findings. Across the included empirical studies, AI-based interventions were reported to be associated with improvements in selected outcomes, including patient self-care and clinical indicators, learner engagement and confidence in nursing education, and aspects of nurse well-being and organizational efficiency. However, findings were heterogeneous, largely derived from small samples and short follow-up periods, and quantitative reporting was inconsistent across studies. Overall, the available evidence suggests that AI is currently applied as an assistive tool supporting specific nursing tasks rather than replacing professional judgment. While AI applications in nursing show promise across several domains, the evidence base remains limited and context-dependent, highlighting the need for further methodologically rigorous and longitudinal research before broader implementation can be confidently supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.