Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613613›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Development and validation of a 1-item very low food security screen.

Ana Poblacion, Richard Sheward, Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana PoblacionDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02119, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5202-3728
Richard ShewardDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02119, United States.
Stephanie Ettinger de CubaDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02119, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-1009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has made screening for health-related social needs (HRSNs) mandatory since 2024. Patients screening positive for HRSN food insecurity (FI) are connected with Supplemental Nutrition Services using 1115 Demonstration waivers. With a shift in funding, Massachusetts adopted a more stringent FI-level screening protocol (very low food security [VLFS]). To date, there is no screening tool that identifies VLFS alone; thus, we developed a sensitive, specific, and valid screen to determine risk for VLFS. Methods: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values were used to test combinations of questions compared with the USDA Household Food Security Survey Module using the 2022 Current Population Survey. Results: The best VLFS screen was, "In the last 12 months, did you or other adults in your household ever cut the size of your meals or skip meals because there wasn't enough money for food?" (yes/no). The screen was highly sensitive, specific, and valid for detecting VLFS risk in US households with and without children (sensitivity, 92.2% and 97.2%; specificity, 96.2% and 97.4%, respectively), and with diverse populations. Conclusion: The VLFS screen is recommended for use by states adopting a more stringent FI-level screening protocol.

Indexed as

food insecurityhealth-related social needshungernutritionscreening tool

Identifiers

PMID41613613
PMCPMC12849366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.