ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Enhancing online adaptive radiotherapy with uncertainty based segmentation error and out-of-distribution detection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anatomical segmentation is one of the biggest sources of uncertainty in the online adaptive radiotherapy workflow. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the estimated uncertainty in deep learning (DL)-based segmentation and the correctness of the segmentations. In addition, the ability to capture out-of-distribution (OOD) data with uncertainty estimation was tested. Materials and methods: The Monte Carlo dropout method was applied to estimate the uncertainty of a DL model for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy prostate cancer images, trained to segment the clinical target volume (CTV), bladder, and rectum. The training/validation set consisted of 151 T2 MR scans from 26 patients, while the test set consisted of 65 scans from 10 patients. Predictive entropy (PE) was used to capture predictive (model and data) uncertainty. The PE distributions for correct and incorrect predictions were used to find a threshold value. Predicted segmentations with PE values above this threshold value were allocated to the "uncertain group," and those below to the "certain group." Dice scores were computed for both groups, using manual segmentations as ground truth. Mutual information (MI) was additionally used to capture epistemic (model) uncertainty as a means to separate in-distribution (ID) from OOD data. Balanced steady-state free precession MRI scans of 10 healthy volunteers were used as OOD data. Results: The segmentation model obtained Dice scores of 85.7% for the CTV, 94.8% for the bladder, and 86.6% for the rectum. The highest PE values were found at the segmentation borders. Higher PE threshold values resulted in better separation between the certain and uncertain groups. This shows the ability to detect incorrect predictions with uncertainty estimation. A 100% separation between ID and OOD data was achieved with MI. Conclusion: Uncertainty estimation from a DL-based segmentation model was seen to correlate with Dice scores for segmentation of MR-guided radiotherapy prostate cancer images. This implies that uncertainty estimation could be used to label the quality of the segmentations in the online adaptive radiotherapy workflow. Preliminary results showed that uncertainty estimation could be used to distinguish between ID and OOD data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.