Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613412›Full record

ArticlemicroPublication biology2026

Christina Hendrickson, Melville B Vaughan, John Nail, Jeremy Dry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in microPublication biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina HendricksonBiology, Oklahoma City University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.
Melville B VaughanBiology, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma, United States.
John NailChemistry , Oklahoma City University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.
Jeremy DryBiology, Oklahoma City University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP20GM103447 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Mark L Lang · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dandelion seed extract exhibits potent anticancer activity in HeLa cells. HeLa viability decreased with increasing doses of DSE from 0 to 0.8 mg/mL, while HDF viability was not affected under similar conditions. DSE reduced HeLa cells' migration speed between 0-0.050 mg/mL, while no significant effect was observed in HDF cells over the same range. Both cell lines exhibited a significant decrease in cell migration speed at 0.1 mg/mL. This data suggests that DSE treatment inhibits cell migration before it significantly reduces cell viability. It points to a specific anti-migratory effect independent of viability loss.

Identifiers

PMID41613412
PMCPMC12848620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.