Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613396›Full record

Observational studyTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025

Multicentre Collaborative Prospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Kidney Transplant Outcomes: The CRAFT Study.

Ruth Owen, Georgios Kourounis, Bishow Karki, Katie Connor, Charlotte Brown, Kayani Kayani, Mohamed Elzawahry, Ruth Blanco, Davide Schilirò, Paul Smith and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ruth OwenHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Georgios KourounisHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Bishow KarkiHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Katie ConnorHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Charlotte BrownHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Kayani KayaniHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Mohamed ElzawahryHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Ruth BlancoHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Davide SchiliròHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Paul SmithStatistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jenny MehewStatistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Miriam ManookAddenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carrie ScuffellInstitute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Aimen AmerInstitute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Samuel TingleHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Emily R ThompsonHerrick Society CRAFT Study Committee, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
CRAFT Study Collaborators

Funding

Kidney Research UK MRC/Y000676/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative complications are common in kidney transplantation. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a well-established multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to improve patient outcomes, however, its efficacy in renal transplant remains poorly described. Participating centres included adult renal transplant recipients and 30-day follow-up data. The primary outcome was LOS. Multivariable hierarchical models compared cohorts. 213 patients were included in the study period. 18/23 UK kidney transplant centres were represented. Analysis of the perioperative care delivery demonstrated similar patterns irrespective of reported protocols, with a tendency towards ERAS-type care. Between cohorts, the incidence of complications were similar; formal ERAS 14.3%, ERAS informal 17.0%, no ERAS 12.6%; p = 0.64. Median LOS was also similar; formal ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-11.5), informal ERAS 7.0 days (5.0-10.5) vs. no ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-10.5); p = 0.75. Readmissions were comparable; p = 0.721. Multivariable models confirmed these findings and demonstrated frailer patients had longer LOS and more readmissions. Currently, most UK renal transplant centres deliver a form of peri-operative ERAS care, indicating broad adoption of ERAS principles. Consequently, a formal ERAS protocol is not associated with decreased complications, LOS or readmissions. Efforts to improve outcomes should focus on prehabilitation of at-risk groups on the waiting list.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryKidney TransplantationAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomenhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)ERAS in kidney transplantationkidneyperioperative careprehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41613396
PMCPMC12849761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.