ArticleInternational journal of translational medical research and public health2025
Building Real-World Evidence Infrastructure to Improve Health and Healthcare in the United States: Part II-How Coordinated Registry Networks Operate Like Systemic Coordinated Inter-Organizational Networks.
Article in International journal of translational medical research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs) are networks of healthcare partners that create and utilize information from clinical society registries and other sources to drive evidence-based improvements in healthcare. In Part I of this three-part series, we introduced the systemic coordinated inter-organizational networks (SCIONs) theory, which is proposed as a unique mode of societal coordination that fosters trust, cooperation, and adaptability among partner organizations to address complex societal problems, including healthcare. In this article, we analyze how CRNs function like SCIONs to better understand how CRNs can promote innovation to improve outcomes, quality, and efficiency. Methods: The SCIONs theory is used to describe the structure and functions of CRNs and to consider how they might be optimized in practice. We apply the SCIONs theory to an extended case study of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) to describe the structure and functions of this CRN. Results: The criteria to identify SCIONs-characteristics, modes of coordination, and performance evaluation-are applied to the VQI as CRN (and to the VQI as an extended case study). CRNs may drive radical innovation in quality improvement, research, regulatory decision-making, and medical product development. The consequences of these innovations in vascular surgery have been measured by reduced patient stays, reduced barriers in care access, and improved care quality metrics. A partnership between the SVS VQI and the Medical Device Epidemiology Network further expanded VQI's capabilities and integrated Medicare data for a robust evaluation of patient outcomes. Key factors making innovation possible include regional sub-networks, collaborative stakeholder relationships, and a dedicated network-coordinating organization that provides technical expertise, leadership, and data quality assurance for effective collaboration. Conclusion and Implications for Translation: The description of the VQI as a SCION offers a generalizable model for the CRN as real-world data collection and analysis that has transformed healthcare delivery and improved patient outcomes at scale. The CRN model is proposed for development broadly across medical and surgical specialties in the US as well as primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.