Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613380›Full record

ArticleJournal of mammalogy2025

Biodiversity conservation depends on the expansion of taxonomy and systematics research.

Luis A Ruedas, Scott L Gardner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammalogy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis A RuedasDepartment of Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Biology, Portland State University, SRTC-247, Portland, OR 97207-0751, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-4799
Scott L GardnerH. W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology, University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-740X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite mammals constituting fewer than 0.3% of all described species, their conservation is compelling for a number of reasons. They contribute to biodiversity and are important in maintaining and regulating ecological communities. Many mammals have significant cultural and economic value, serving as sources of food, medicine, and tourism revenue. Furthermore, the conservation of mammals often leads to the protection of entire habitats, benefiting numerous other species and preserving ecosystem services that are critical for human well--being. Humans share a unique evolutionary history with other mammal species, making their preservation important for scientific research, education, and understanding of our own biology and evolution. In spite of this, mammalian biodiversity is at severe risk, with 26% of all mammal species threatened with extinction. Here, we propose to use a 4-step framework with which to approach conservation strategy for mammalian biodiversity. The framework is structured and based on a protocol initially established from the standpoint of parasites by Daniel R. Brooks and collaborators in 2014. The 4 key phases are

Indexed as

actionconservationinventorymammalsnatural areasnature

Identifiers

PMID41613380
PMCPMC12846871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.