ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2025
Machine learning-based comprehensive analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators in colorectal cancer: implications for prognosis, immune microenvironment, and immunotherapy response.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Reader-dependent functional duality of FTO: a context-switching node at the intersection of immune evasion and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation regulators have been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression. However, systematic evaluation using multiple machine learning approaches for prognostic prediction remains limited. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for CRC prognosis based on m6A regulators and assess their potential for immunotherapy response prediction. We analyzed 1,047 CRC patients from TCGA and GEO databases (70% training, 30% validation). Twenty machine learning algorithms were systematically evaluated, with LASSO regression selecting optimal features from 27 m6A regulators. SHAP analysis provided model interpretability. Immune microenvironment characterization and immunotherapy response prediction were performed using established computational methods. LASSO regression selected eight m6A regulators (IGF2BP2, METTL3, HNRNPA2B1, METTL14, YTHDF2, VIRMA, FTO, ALKBH5) for model construction. Among 20 algorithms tested, Random Forest achieved optimal performance (training AUC = 0.895, validation AUC = 0.847). SHAP analysis identified IGF2BP2 (mean |SHAP| = 0.42) and METTL3 (mean |SHAP| = 0.36) as primary contributors to risk prediction. Risk stratification showed significant survival differences (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.73-3.36, p < 0.001). Low-risk patients demonstrated enhanced immune infiltration with higher CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.