ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnostic accuracy of the HUAWEI WATCH D for measuring spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: a diagnostic test.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The newly developed HUAWEI WATCH D (HW) is a wearable smartwatch, primarily designed to measure non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) at the wrist. Two recent studies have demonstrated that the accuracy of HW is the same as that of mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring BP in adults. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the HW in hypotension monitoring. Methods: A total of 118 healthy parturients with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean section were included. BP was measured three times preoperatively on the left wrist using HW and on the right upper limb using an Omron BP monitor, with the respective mean values recorded as the baseline values in the supine position. After spinal anesthesia, bilateral BP was measured simultaneously by HW and a NIBP monitor at 1-min intervals, 10 times. The primary outcome was the Chi-squared test results comparing hypotension detected between HW and NIBP, as well as the area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the Youden index, and the cut-off point of HW for measuring hypotension. Results: Overall, 1180 pairs of systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured. Using an SBP of <80% baseline values of NIBP as the gold standard for hypotension, Youden Index = 0.62, the hypotension threshold for HW is set to 104 mmHg, with sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 82.0%, false positive rate of 18.0%, and false negative rate of 20.8%, and accuracy of 81.3%. The Chi-squared test yielded a Pearson γ Conclusion: The HUAWEI WATCH D demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe hypotension (SBP < 80% baseline) during caesarian section under spinal anesthesia, with a sensitivity of 79.2%, a specificity of 82.0%, and an AUC of 0.87.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.