Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613256›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging research2026

Flexible Goal Adjustment Predicts Well-Being Before and After Retirement.

Lisa M Viegas, Christina Bermeitinger, Werner Greve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa M ViegasInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany, uni-hildesheim.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1851-0045
Christina BermeitingerInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany, uni-hildesheim.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9977-7001
Werner GreveInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany, uni-hildesheim.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-2770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Retirement represents a critical life change and is accompanied by the blocking of professional goals. We assume that the individual capability to adapt goals to changed conditions has a palliative effect on well-being. The aim of the present study was to assess interindividual differences in goal adjustment and to analyse the predictive value of these goal adjustments for personal well-being. Research Design and Methods: 206 pastors participated in a self-report online study. We assessed their current working status, individual preparedness for flexible goal adjustment (FGA), and the current importance of private and professional goals. Furthermore, their well-being and self-esteem were measured. Results: Our data showed that retired individuals rated professional, but not private, goals as less important than working individuals. Additionally, FGA predicted self-esteem and well-being for both working and retired individuals. Discussion and Implications: While there was no correlation between FGA and the importance of professional goals, the results still indicate that goal adjustment can help maintain well-being in retirement.

Indexed as

critical life changegoal adjustmentretirement outcomesself-regulation

Identifiers

PMID41613256
PMCPMC12848535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.