Skimming and storage factors affect the detection of heat shock protein 70 in raw bovine milk.

M R H Rakib, V Messina, J I Gargiulo, N A Lyons, I N Pathirana, P C Thomson, S C Garcia

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M R H RakibDairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

V MessinaDairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

J I GargiuloDairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

N A LyonsDairyNZ, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

I N PathiranaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Kamburupitiya 81100, Sri Lanka.

P C ThomsonDairy UP Program, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

S C GarciaDairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock proteins (HSP) play a vital role in maintaining cellular function under elevated temperatures. Among these, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) has recently been detected in bovine milk using competitive ELISA, highlighting its potential as a noninvasive marker of cellular stress and a tool for detecting heat stress (HS) in dairy cows. However, optimal management and storage conditions of milk samples for detection of HSP70 are yet to be determined. This study aimed to evaluate how different management and storage practices affect detection of HSP70 in milk samples. Samples were skimmed by centrifugation either before storage (SBS) or after storage (SAS), and then stored under different temperatures: (a) room temperature (T

Identifiers

PMID41613219

DOI10.3168/jdsc.2025-0759

PMCPMC12848285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.