Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613201›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2025

Relationships between method used for bedding processing and presence of mastitis and nonmastitis pathogens in ready-to-use recycled manure solids bedding on Midwest dairy farms.

F Peña-Mosca, S Godden, E Royster, D Albrecht, S J Wells, B A C Crooker, N Aulik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Cluster ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F Peña-MoscaDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
S GoddenDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
E RoysterDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
D AlbrechtDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
S J WellsDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
B A C CrookerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
N AulikWisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field studies have examined how processing methods affect mastitis pathogen levels in ready-to-use (RTU) recycled manure solids (RMS), but few have assessed their impact on nonmastitis pathogens. This cross-sectional study investigated associations between RMS processing methods and (1) mastitis pathogen levels and (2) the presence of

Identifiers

PMID41613201
PMCPMC12848286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.