ArticleJDS communications2025
Evaluating bacterial growth in raw, frozen, and heat-treated colostrum inoculated with fecal
Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Providing newborn calves with sufficient high-quality colostrum is a critical calf-management strategy to support health, survival, and future productivity. Unfortunately, colostrum may also serve as a fomite for disease when contaminated with bacteria at harvest, during storage, or during reheating before feeding. Thermal processing, including heat treatment (HT; 60°C for 60 min) and freezing (FR; -20°C), are common strategies to manage bacterial contamination. Although both strategies maintain IgG concentrations, they destroy colostral immune cells, and HT is known to decrease the concentration and activity of certain bioactive factors such as complement and IgA. We hypothesized that HT and FR would influence the inherent antibacterial properties of bovine colostrum compared with unprocessed, refrigerated colostrum (RW). Our objective was thus to compare growth of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.