Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613194›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2025

Plasma oxytocin in dry dairy cows after using a mechanical brush.

Lena Skånberg, Sigrid Agenäs, Rupert Bruckmaier, Daiana de Oliveira, Linda Keeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lena SkånbergDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Sigrid AgenäsDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Rupert BruckmaierVeterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Daiana de OliveiraDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Linda KeelingDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical brushes are a common feature in loose housing systems for dairy cows and are suggested to be linked to positive welfare, yet the physiological effects of brush use remain unexplored. This study examined the influence of cows' mechanical brush use on plasma oxytocin (OT) levels and explored its relationship with which body regions were brushed by the cow. We predicted that this self-grooming would lead to an OT increase, suggesting calming effects and pleasant feelings from brush use similar to those found from gentle tactile stimulation in other mammals. Additionally, we expected an influence of the body region brushed, given previously documented heart rate and behavioral differences from allogrooming different cow body regions. Twelve dry (nonlactating) cows were observed, with 3 blood samples taken before and after brushing, during which each cow had sole access to a mechanical brush. Results showed that OT levels in the sample taken within the 2 min following brush use were higher than baseline value, but only in younger cows with ≤2 previous lactation periods. The increase was small but may be of biological relevance. Additionally, OT changes varied by the brushed body region, highlighting the importance of this factor in future studies investigating cows' brush use in relation to positive welfare.

Identifiers

PMID41613194
PMCPMC12848266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.