Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613185›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Integrating machine learning into acupuncture research: a scoping review.

Wancy Chan, Guan-Jun Huang, Chien-Chen Huang, Yi-Hung Chen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wancy Chan *Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Guan-Jun Huang *Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chien-Chen HuangDepartment of Chinese Medicine, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yi-Hung ChenGraduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Machine learning offers new tools to address the variability and subjectivity in acupuncture research. This scoping study aims to map existing literature on the use of machine learning in acupuncture research. It identifies the disease conditions most frequently targeted for machine learning-based efficacy prediction, examines the machine learning methods employed, and assesses the data inputs, methodological limitations, and existing knowledge gaps in the field. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed database using the keywords "acupuncture" and "machine learning" for publications from 2011 to 2024. Results: A total of 36 relevant articles were identified, with a notable increase after 2019. Most publications originated from China. Seventeen studies focused on predicting acupuncture efficacy, primarily for pain-related conditions. The remaining studies addressed diverse topics, including acupuncture manipulation technique detection, prescription recommendation, exploration of efficacy-related factors, acupoint sensitization prediction and specificity identification, acupuncture usage frequency prediction, investigation of acupoint-meridian conduction effects, and acupuncture robotic point localization. In efficacy prediction studies, support vector machines were the most frequently employed algorithm. Seven of the 11 studies combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a feature for their models, and treatment responder classification was often used as labels. Conclusion: Most studies reported encouraging predictive performance, indicating that machine learning methods can be effectively applied to acupuncture efficacy prediction. Support vector machines, in particular, demonstrated significant potential. These findings suggest that machine learning could improve the precision and efficiency of acupuncture treatments and help create more personalized and effective treatment plans. However, small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, inconsistent data types, and lack of standardized datasets limit model generalizability and comparability. Important gaps remain, including mechanistic understanding, long-term outcome prediction, and evaluation of clinical impact. Future research should focus on larger, multi-center studies with standardized protocols, rigorous external validation, and assessment of clinical utility to advance the integration of machine learning into acupuncture practice.

Indexed as

acupunctureartificial intelligenceefficacy predictionmachine learningpain

Identifiers

PMID41613185
PMCPMC12848914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.