ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Effect of ultrasound-guided scalp nerve block on hemodynamics and postoperative agitation in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage craniotomy patients: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07545655 (Investigation of the Effects of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Scalp Block on Perioperative Opioid Consumption, Hemodynamic Stability, and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy With a Skull Pin Head Holder), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of the Effects of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Scalp Block on Perioperative Opioid Consumption, Hemodynamic Stability, and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy With a Skull Pin Head Holder
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine scalp nerve block (SNB) on analgesic effects in patients undergoing craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 HICH patients who underwent craniotomy at Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from May 2022 to April 2024. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: control group (A, no SNB), ropivacaine SNB group (B, 0.5% ropivacaine), and dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine SNB group (C, 0.5% ropivacaine + 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine), with 40 patients in each group. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic parameters [mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR)], intraoperative anesthetic consumption, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and incidence of adverse reactions within 48 h postoperatively. Results: General characteristics were comparable among the three groups ( Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for SNB improves postoperative analgesia, stabilizes intraoperative hemodynamics, reduces anesthetic usage and rescue analgesia needs, and lowers the incidence of adverse reactions in HICH craniotomy patients, making it a safe and effective analgesic strategy. Clinical trial registration: chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2500106043.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.