ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Effect of traditional Chinese exercises on motor function, balance, gait, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by progressive impairments in motor function, balance, and gait, which significantly compromise activities of daily living and overall quality of life. Traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs), recognised as a mind-body, non-pharmacological therapy, are frequently incorporated into the clinical management of PD. Despite their widespread use, the optimal therapeutic effects and ideal exercise prescriptions for TCEs remain uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of TCEs on motor function, balance, gait, and quality of life in patients with PD through a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the goal of providing evidence-based guidance for the selection of the most suitable exercise regimen. Methods: This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilising the PICOS framework to systematically search seven databases-CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science-for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception up to October 2025. Two independent authors screened all eligible studies, and study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1. Extracted data were statistically analysed using RevMan 5.4 software, calculating the mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and evaluating heterogeneity (I Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 859 patients were ultimately included in the analysis1. The meta-analysis results showed that, compared with the usual control group, TCEs significantly improved patients' motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III, UPDRS-III, MD: -4.30, 95% CI: -5.90 to -2.70, Conclusion: TCEs can serve as an effective adjunct to conventional therapy, significantly improving motor and balance functions in patients with PD. Based on these findings, we recommend Qigong as the preferred modality for early- and moderate-stage PD patients, with an optimal initial prescription involving a duration of ≤12 weeks, a frequency of > 3 times per week, and the independent practise of TCEs. However, studies on the effects of TCEs on gait function and quality of life are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.