Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613160›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical health & safety2026

An Experimental Study of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from a Resin 3D Printer to Assess Exposure and Exposure Mitigation.

Danielle A Baguley, Delphine Bard, Gareth S Evans, Paul S Monks, Rebecca L Cordell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical health & safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle A BaguleySchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-5132
Delphine BardHealth and Safety Executive (HSE), Science Division, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, U.K.
Gareth S EvansInsight for Work, Sheffield S17 3PD, U.K.
Paul S MonksSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.
Rebecca L CordellSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent increases in the popularity of affordable 3D printers necessitate research to investigate the potential volatile organic compound (VOC) exposure that an operator would experience. VOC emissions from a Formlabs Form 2 were tested using four different resins (Clear, White, Tough, and Elastic) across several time-resolved tests and exposure scenarios: an enclosed test chamber, and within a ventilated room at two distances, with an extraction hood to investigate "real-world" exposure scenarios and the impact of mitigation methods. 2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate, 3-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate were the prominent VOCs emitted from the resin 3D printing process, among other acrylic-based compounds. The composition of the VOCs was dependent on the type of resin: Elastic resin emitted a greater diversity of compounds, including the previously unreported isobornyl acrylate, while Tough resin emitted higher concentrations of smaller cross-linking compounds such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. VOC emissions peaked at the end of the active printing process when the build plate rose from the liquid resin bed. In the enclosed chamber scenario, total VOC (TVOC) concentrations exceeded 128,000 μg/m

Indexed as

3D printingemission mitigationexposure assessmentindoor air qualityresin printingvat photopolymerizationvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID41613160
PMCPMC12848961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.