ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Ideational and conceptual apraxia by cerebral infarction in the left basal ganglia and right pons: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a rare and uncommon case of ideational apraxia (IA) and conceptual apraxia (CA) in a 70-year-old woman after concurrent cerebral infarctions of the left basal ganglia (BG) extending to the corona radiata and the right pons. The patient abruptly developed difficulty operating devices such as the car's gear shift and smartphone. The brain MRI on admission disclosed infarction in the area involving the left BG and right pons. During rehabilitation therapy, she exhibited features of IA and CA, including sequencing failures when using technological devices and a profound loss of functional knowledge, exemplified by an inability to recall the purpose and functions of an automated teller machine (ATM) despite prior proficiency. A testing error involved using the keyboard rather than the mouse to open a file. Behaviorally, she impulsively initiated actions and sometimes scheduled conflicting appointments. Neuropsychological testing showed preserved scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised (HDS-R), but memory impairment was evident on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) and the Standard Verbal Paired Associates Learning Test (S-PA). The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) revealed marked dysexecutive symptoms, and the Clinical Assessment for Attention (CAT) indicated reduced auditory selective attention and diminished inhibitory control. Notably, the Standard Performance Test for Apraxia (SPTA) yielded normal results. Treated with antiplatelets then antihypertensives, she was discharged home four months later. Attention deficits and driving cessation persisted, but daily life was minimally affected. Although IA and CA are typically linked to left-hemisphere damage, particularly to the BG, the right pontine lesion may have contributed to the deficits, possibly through network disruption. This infarct pattern suggests a complex interplay in apraxia development and warrants further mechanistic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.