Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613135›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Understanding the performance of HIV-1 viral vector vaccines: adenovirus and poxvirus case studies.

Mahdiyeh M Manafi, Touraj Farzani, Nallely Espinoza, Al Ozonoff, Pardis C Sabeti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahdiyeh M ManafiDepartment of Exercise and Health Sciences, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States.
Touraj FarzaniBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Nallely EspinozaBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Al OzonoffBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Pardis C SabetiBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of research, HIV-1 continues to infect millions annually, underscoring the urgent need for a safe and effective vaccine to curb the ongoing global pandemic. Among the many strategies explored, viral vectors have been the most intensively studied, with adenoviral and poxviral platforms serving as the leading approaches. These vectors have advanced through extensive preclinical evaluation and multiple large-scale clinical trials, demonstrating safety and the ability to induce cellular and humoral responses. Yet, they have also revealed key challenges, including pre-existing vector immunity, limited durability of responses, and in some cases, increased susceptibility to infection. Importantly, these trials clarified the limitations of Env-focused immunity, highlighted the value of heterologous prime-boost regimens, and reinforced the dual need for broadly neutralizing antibodies and functional T cell responses. While vector-based COVID vaccines achieved protective efficacy, lessons learned from adenoviral and poxviral efforts continue to shape the field, directly informing the design of next-generation platforms such as mRNA and engineered viral vectors.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAIDS VaccinesGenetic VectorsHIV-1HIV InfectionsPoxviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, Neutralizingadenoviralantibody responseclinical trialHIV-1poxviral

Identifiers

PMID41613135
PMCPMC12847266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.