ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Diagnostic biomarkers for differentiating AQP4-IgG- negative NMOSD from other nervous system autoimmune disorders: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The clinical manifestations of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) overlap with those of other central nervous system (CNS) disorders, making differential diagnosis based on symptoms alone difficult. This study aimed to identify distinguishing indicators of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) IgG-negative NMOSD and assess their diagnostic value. Methods: We analyzed four groups: 85 patients with AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD, 192 with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, 547 with other nervous system autoimmune disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and viral and autoimmune encephalitis), and 269 healthy controls matched for sex, age, and BMI.A diagnostic model was established using clinical, biochemical, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) variables. The dataset was divided into training and internal validation cohorts, and model performance was further assessed through external validation using an independently collected dataset obtained during the same study period. Results: We enrolled 1,093 participants. The AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD group showed: higher diplopia incidence (35.29% vs. 17.19% in positive NMOSD, 17.18% in controls; P<0.001); lower limb sensory abnormalities (76.47% vs. 89.58%, P = 0.0056) and urinary dysfunction (36.47% vs. 57.29%, P = 0.0017) than positive cases; predominant brainstem involvement (50.59% vs. 31.77% in positive, 28.70% in controls; P<0.001); moderate spinal cord involvement (70.59% vs. 88.02% in positive, 38.57% in controls; P<0.001); and altered thyroxine, apolipoprotein A1, eosinophils, and basophils. After false discovery rate correction (q<0.1), diplopia, brainstem involvement, spinal cord involvement, serum albumin, and CSF albumin remained significant. A combined model incorporating twelve predictors (Ocular symptoms, Gastrointestinal symptoms, Water swallowing and choking difficulties, Cerebral lobes, Centrum semiovale, Brainstem, Cerebral ganglia, Spinal cord, APOA1, Ca, Toxoplasma gondii IgM Antibody, CSF IgG) achieved an AUC of 0.936in the training cohort and 0.929 in external validation. Discussion: AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD shows distinct clinical, imaging, and laboratory profiles compared to other nervous system autoimmune disorders. A multi-indicator diagnostic approach offers higher accuracy than single-marker diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.