ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Awareness, utilization, and implementation barriers of the wheelchair skills program and test in Korea: a survey of users and clinicians.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Wheelchair Skills Program (WSP) and Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) have been widely validated and implemented in Western rehabilitation settings. However, although the WSP and WST have been introduced in Korea, the extent of their awareness and use remains unclear. In addition, their clinical- and community-level integration has not yet been systematically evaluated. Objective: To investigate the awareness, utilization, and perceived necessity of WSP and WST among wheelchair users and clinical professionals in Korea, and to identify barriers to implementation and preferences for future program development. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between August 2023 and July 2024. A total of 134 wheelchair users and 120 clinical professionals (physical therapists) participated. Validated questionnaires assessed demographics, wheelchair skill usage and training experience, awareness of WSP/WST, and preferences for program formats. Results: Awareness of WSP and WST was critically low in both groups: 98.3% of clinicians and 82.1% of users reported no knowledge of related training manuals or tools. Only 5.0% of clinicians had ever used training or assessment materials. Among clinicians, the most frequently taught skills were transfer (65%), body lift (48.3%), and forward propulsion (35%). In contrast, users most frequently performed forward propulsion (47.8%), reverse propulsion (34.3%), and turning (30.6%), highlighting a mismatch between instruction and real-world demands. Over 70% of respondents in both groups agreed that a Korean-style wheelchair skills program would be useful (71.7% of clinicians; 89.6% of users). Preferred formats differed: 56.7% of clinicians favored mobile/online delivery, while users expressed similar interest in both mobile platforms (38.3%) and in-person training by professionals (35.8%). Barriers to implementation included high patient loads (47.8% treating over 20 patients daily) and a national shortage of physical therapists (0.84 per 1,000 population, below the OECD average of 1.09). Conclusion: Despite the introduction of K-WSP, awareness and utilization of wheelchair skill training programs remain extremely limited in Korea. There are clear gaps between clinical practice and user needs, as well as structural barriers such as workforce limitations and lack of institutional support. To address these issues, national strategies must promote curricular integration, continuing education, policy-level support, and digital platform development to enable scalable wheelchair skill education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.