ArticleSIAM journal on mathematics of data science2023
Optimally Weighted PCA for High-Dimensional Heteroscedastic Data.
Article in SIAM journal on mathematics of data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ALPCAHUS: Subspace Clustering for Heteroscedastic Data.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2026Article
- The Dyson equalizer: adaptive noise stabilization for low-rank signal detection and recovery.Information and inference : a journal of the IMA · 2025Article
- Spatial Transcriptomics in Human Cardiac Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- iSC.MEB: an R package for multi-sample spatial clustering analysis of spatial transcriptomics data.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern data are increasingly both high-dimensional and heteroscedastic. This paper considers the challenge of estimating underlying principal components from high-dimensional data with noise that is heteroscedastic across samples, i.e., some samples are noisier than others. Such heteroscedasticity naturally arises, e.g., when combining data from diverse sources or sensors. A natural way to account for this heteroscedasticity is to give noisier blocks of samples less weight in PCA by using the leading eigenvectors of a weighted sample covariance matrix. We consider the problem of choosing weights to optimally recover the underlying components. In general, one cannot know these optimal weights since they depend on the underlying components we seek to estimate. However, we show that under some natural statistical assumptions the optimal weights converge to a simple function of the signal and noise variances for high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, the optimal weights are not the inverse noise variance weights commonly used in practice. We demonstrate the theoretical results through numerical simulations and comparisons with existing weighting schemes. Finally, we briefly discuss how estimated signal and noise variances can be used when the true variances are unknown, and we illustrate the optimal weights on real data from astronomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.