ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2026
A new era in identification of tick genera; artificial intelligence for precision and speed.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The occurrence of pandemics in the last 20 years highlighted the unpreparedness of healthcare systems. There is a worldwide increased trend in the vector borne diseases. Ticks are one of the most common organisms that play a vital role in global ecosystem as well as being vectors of diseases affecting human and livestock. They are able to carry infectious agents that might cause illnesses including paralysis and to some certain extend death. Therefore, it is crucial to identify different genera of ticks to track infectious agents. Conventionally, tick classification is done by acarologists who are experts in the field. For this reason, the identification process is carried out in a difficult and time-consuming manner. Method: The aim of the study was to develop a web-based application by using artificial intelligence-based algorithms to easily identify Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus ticks, which are the most abundant genera in Northern Cyprus, with high sensitivity and accuracy. The experimental procedure is structured based on five phases. Phase 1 revolves around data collection in which pictures of 35 identified ticks are taken by experienced acarologists and the curation of non-tick images (spiders, beetles, mites, mosquitos and scorpions). Phase 2 revolves around pre-processing steps and data split. Phase 3 involves training and testing custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), Residual Network 50 (ResNet-50) using 6,972 images (3,486 images for each class) for discrimination between ticks and non-ticks and 9,556 images (4,778 images for each class) for the discrimination between Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. Phase 4 revolves around performance evaluation. Phase 5 is characterized by development of a web-based application (I-TickNet), created to enable a widespread use of the tick classifier. Results: The performance evaluation and comparison of the model performance has shown that ResNet50 achieved the best result for binary classification of tick and non-tick (experiment A) with accuracy of 100% and Area Under the Curve (AUC) score of 100%. Moreover, VGG16 achieved the best result for binary classification of ticks (experiment B) with an accuracy of 96.97% and AUC score of 99.55% respectively. All the three models were employed for the development of artificial intelligence/Internet of Things (AI/IoT) framework known as I-TickNet for real-time and on-spot classification of tick images. In conclusion, this study provided a web-based application that can identify two distinct tick genera with high accuracy and sensitivity. The application developed enabled a user-friendly interface to identify genera without requiring any expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.