ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Cardiorespiratory fitness does not predict longitudinal changes in manual dexterity, cognition or corticospinal excitability in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis leads to progressive cognitive and motor impairments. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is thought to protect against such decline, but its longitudinal effects remain unclear. This study examined whether CRF predicts changes in behavioral (i.e., hand dexterity and cognition) and neurophysiological (i.e., corticospinal excitability, an indicator of corticospinal tract function) outcomes in multiple sclerosis over 2 years, with a focus on participants who experienced no relapses between visits and were, therefore, classified as progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). We hypothesized that higher baseline CRF would be associated with better follow-up outcomes. Methods: Participants underwent assessments at two time points (∼2 years apart). CRF was measured using a graded maximal exercise test ( Results: Among 38 participants (71% female), CRF at baseline did not significantly predict changes in behavioral or physiological outcomes ( Discussion: CRF did not predict longitudinal changes in manual dexterity, cognition or corticospinal excitability in individuals living with multiple sclerosis. Instead, initial performance was the primary determinant of follow-up outcomes, suggesting that achieving better function at baseline (earlier in the disease) is an important rehabilitation target. Variability in longitudinal change underscores the heterogeneous nature of disease progression/improvement and the need for specific, targeted interventions and personalized strategies to disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.