ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Improved Pain and Function Using Multiphase Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Nonsurgical Spine Patient.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease (DDD) and lumbar spondylosis is a leading cause of disability. Many patients exhaust conservative and interventional treatments yet remain poor surgical candidates. Spinal cord stimulation may be an effective therapy for many of these patients. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old female with lumbar DDD and lumbar spondylosis presented with chronic low back pain refractory to conservative therapy. She previously failed acetaminophen, NSAIDs, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, and opioids, as well as multiple interventional procedures including epidural steroid injections, medial branch blocks, radiofrequency ablation, and sacroiliac joint injections. The patient underwent an SCS trial using the Biotronik Prospera system with multiphase stimulation, achieving approximately 60% pain relief and marked functional improvement. She subsequently received a permanent SCS implant, reporting >90% sustained pain reduction. She was able to discontinue opioid therapy entirely. At >9-month follow-up, she continued to experience durable benefit, had lost more than 35 pounds, increased physical activity, and returned to independent function. Conclusion: This case highlights the effectiveness of SCS as a treatment option for chronic nonsurgical back pain, demonstrating not only substantial pain reduction but also improved function, weight loss, medication reduction, and overall quality of life. Multiphase stimulation with the Biotronik Prospera system may provide an effective alternative for patients who do not respond to comprehensive conservative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.