ArticleJournal of magnetism and magnetic materials2025
On the effect of reference and sample volume on magnetic particle imaging quantification.
Article in Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic evaluation of magnetic particle imaging quantification strategies in biologically relevant scenarios using anatomically correct 3D printed mouse phantoms.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is an emerging biomedical imaging modality that enables non-invasive quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) tracers by comparing signal in a region of interest (ROI) to that of reference samples of known tracer mass. However, despite growing interest and use of MPI, recent studies have raised concern over quantification accuracy as a function of the volume over which the tracer is distributed. Here, a constant mass dilution series of the tracer Ferucarbotran contained in well-defined sample geometries was used to evaluate the effect of relative reference and object sample volumes on MPI quantification accuracy. MPI images of this series were acquired under various scan modes, segmented using two commonly used methods, and iron mass quantified relative to two reference sample sets with different volumes. The maximum signal and percent error relative to ground truth were compared amongst these sample volumes, scan modes, analysis methods, and reference volumes. Tracer concentration influenced signal distribution and, in some cases, influenced iron estimation accuracy. Reference samples that were similar in volume to the volume of interest were found to provide the most accurate results across scan modes. The observed behavior is attributed to the partial volume effect, which arises due to the finite resolution in MPI. These results are discussed within the current scope of the field and suggest that care must be taken when selecting reference sample volume relative to test sample volume for quantitative MPI studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.