Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612994›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetism and magnetic materials2025

On the effect of reference and sample volume on magnetic particle imaging quantification.

Sarah N Parrett, Sebastian A Montero, Hayden J Good, Andrii Melnyk, Carlos M Rinaldi-Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah N ParrettJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32601.
Sebastian A MonteroDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL, 32601.
Hayden J GoodDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL, 32601.
Andrii MelnykDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL, 32601.
Carlos M Rinaldi-RamosJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32601.

Funding

NIH Administrative Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchR01EB031224 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RINALDI-RAMOS, CARLOS M · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Innovative Non-Invasive Imaging of Traumatic Brain InjuryR21NS125089 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RINALDI-RAMOS, CARLOS M · 2022 to 2022
$401k
Nanoparticles for In Vivo Labeling of T Cells During Cancer ImmunotherapyR21CA263653 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RINALDI-RAMOS, CARLOS M · 2022 to 2023
$371k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263653NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031224NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS125089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is an emerging biomedical imaging modality that enables non-invasive quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) tracers by comparing signal in a region of interest (ROI) to that of reference samples of known tracer mass. However, despite growing interest and use of MPI, recent studies have raised concern over quantification accuracy as a function of the volume over which the tracer is distributed. Here, a constant mass dilution series of the tracer Ferucarbotran contained in well-defined sample geometries was used to evaluate the effect of relative reference and object sample volumes on MPI quantification accuracy. MPI images of this series were acquired under various scan modes, segmented using two commonly used methods, and iron mass quantified relative to two reference sample sets with different volumes. The maximum signal and percent error relative to ground truth were compared amongst these sample volumes, scan modes, analysis methods, and reference volumes. Tracer concentration influenced signal distribution and, in some cases, influenced iron estimation accuracy. Reference samples that were similar in volume to the volume of interest were found to provide the most accurate results across scan modes. The observed behavior is attributed to the partial volume effect, which arises due to the finite resolution in MPI. These results are discussed within the current scope of the field and suggest that care must be taken when selecting reference sample volume relative to test sample volume for quantitative MPI studies.

Indexed as

3D PrintingImagingMagnetic Particle ImagingQuantificationSPION

Identifiers

PMID41612994
PMCPMC12851616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.