ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Lumen-apposing metal stents versus double pigtail plastic stents for early (<4 weeks of illness) endoscopic transluminal drainage of pancreatic necrotic collections.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic necrotic collections (PNC) gradually liquefy over time. In the early phase of pancreatitis (<4 weeks), collections contain more solid debris. This study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of endoscopic transluminal drainage (ETD) using multiple plastic stents (MPS) vs. lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in early-phase PNC. Methods: A retrospective, single-center, and non-randomized review was conducted of patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage/debridement of PNC between January 2018 and November 2024. Patients who had early ETD with either MPS or LAMS were included. Data compared included demographics, clinical features, indications, intervention details, need for endoscopic necrosectomy (ETN), complications, need for surgery, and outcomes. Results: Forty-five patients (39 male) received LAMS, and 21 (18 male) received MPS. PNC size and necrotic content were similar between groups. Technical success was 100% in both groups, but clinical success was significantly higher with LAMS (89% vs. 48%; P<0.001). ETN was more frequent in the MPS group (86% vs. 58%; P=0.02), as was the mean number of procedures (6.1 vs. 4.1; P=0.009). MPS was associated with higher mortality (19% vs. 6%), need for surgical necrosectomy (52% vs. 11%), and post-procedure bleeding (24% vs. 11%). Conclusion: LAMS seem to be superior to MPS for ETD of early-phase symptomatic PNC, showing higher clinical success, with fewer complications, procedures and rescue surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.