ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis with normal biochemical, endoscopic and histologic findings: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune-mediated diarrhea with normal investigations: the importance of diagnostic stratification and small-bowel assessment.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
- Authors' reply.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) due to checkpoint inhibition infrequently presents with normal stool biomarkers and no endoscopic or histologic evidence of inflammation. Little is known about the treatment needs and outcomes of this subset of patients. We aimed to describe this entity and clarify the role of immunosuppressive treatments in its management. Method: This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors who developed clinical symptoms of IMDC, with no evidence of inflammation based on fecal calprotectin or endoscopic/histologic evaluation, between January 2010 and February 2024. Results: Of 1151 patients with IMDC, 131 (11.4%) had no evidence of inflammation. These patients more frequently had PD-1/L1 agent exposure (P=0.019) and presented with less severe diarrhea than patients with evidence of inflammation (P<0.001). This group had a lower rate of hospitalization (P=0.003). Around 40% of patients with no evidence of inflammation required immunosuppressive treatment. There was no difference in clinical symptoms or severity between patients requiring immunosuppression and those who did not. Conclusions: Our study is the first to explore IMDC with no elevations in calprotectin and normal endoscopic/histologic findings. We found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition may predispose patients to developing this form of IMDC, which is associated with a lower severity of diarrhea, fewer hospitalizations and lower recurrence rates. Many patients still require immunosuppressive treatment, and a small subset later develop colonic inflammation. Future studies are needed to further elucidate the treatment needs and outcomes of this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.