Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612899›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2026

Functional and Clinical: An Explainable Deep Learning Model for Multimodal Alzheimer's Disease Classification.

Samuel L Warren, Ahmed A Moustafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel L WarrenSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-1791
Ahmed A MoustafaSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and deep learning models can classify Alzheimer's disease (AD) with high accuracy. These models are highly adaptable and work with a plethora of architectures, data types, and AD stages. However, fMRI deep learning models lack clinical application due to issues with small datasets, explainability, and reliability (e.g., data leakage).

methodsIn this study, we address these issues using multimodal and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods. Specifically, we overcome data size limitations by supplementing fMRI data with clinical tests, use a strict leave-one-out cross-validation regime to control for data leakage, and apply perturbation ranking to explain the importance of features in our model. Our 3D convolutional neural network model was trained and validated on 52 participants from ADNI using five clinical tests and fMRI of the default mode network.

findingsThe resulting multimodal model classified AD from controls with an accuracy of 90% and outperformed the same architecture without clinical data (58% accuracy). Our feature rankings showed that clinical tests changed in importance within our model depending on the diagnostic group. For example, our model found the MoCA to be highly important for classifying controls but not for AD. This trend of feature importance was seen across almost all fMRI and clinical features.

conclusionOur model was highly accurate and highlighted the importance of combining fMRI and clinical data for AD classification. These findings have implications for the refinement of multimodal deep learning models; however, our small sample and need for external validation are also noted.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAlzheimer's disease (AD)clinical datadeep learningdefault mode network (DMN)explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

Identifiers

PMID41612899
PMCPMC12856375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.