SynthesisJournal of global health2026
Folate and global health umbrella review series, part 1: methodological framework and syntheses on anaemia and neural tube defects.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Folate and global health umbrella review series, part 2: syntheses on cancers.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- Folate and global health: part 5. syntheses on neuropsychiatric disorders.Journal of global health · 2026Review
- Choline and Its Companions: Inter-Related Roles of Choline and B Vitamins in Fetal Development and Offspring Health.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Folate and global health review series, part 4: syntheses on folate and autoimmune diseases and skeletal outcomes.Journal of global health · 2026Review
- Folate and global health review series, part 3: syntheses on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and metabolic diseases.Journal of global health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Folate is essential for normal growth and in human health throughout the lifecycle. Clinical deficiency of folate impairs DNA synthesis and results in megaloblastic anaemia, while suboptimal folate status before and in early pregnancy results in an elevated risk of neural tube defects (NTD). The evidence on the association of folate status with other health outcomes is largely fragmented and understudied. We conducted a series of umbrella reviews examining the association between folate and multiple health outcomes in various populations and settings. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and DARE from inception to February 2024 for systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses examining an association between folate intake/status and any health outcome. We performed screening and data extraction in duplicate and assessed the risk of bias using the ROBIS tool. Evidence was then characterised into unique associations (unique exposure measure - unique outcome measure - unique setting). For each category of unique associations, we identified the evidence based on the statistical power, recency of publication and the potential risk of bias. All unique associations were evaluated for credibility using predefined criteria. Results: We retrieved 3565 records and included 283 in the final synthesis. The evidence on anaemia consisted of four intervention trials demonstrating effectiveness of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy in reducing the risk of megaloblastic anaemia (relative risk (RR) = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.11, 0.38; I Conclusion: In NTDs and anaemia, we identified strong evidence supporting the protective role of folate status based on intervention trials and observational studies. More recent reviews examining the role of folate in other less well understood health conditions will be presented in the subsequent reports. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021265041.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.