ArticleEpidemiology and health2026
Normal liver enzymes do not indicate safety from alcohol-related liver disease: evidence from a Korean nationwide cohort.
Article in Epidemiology and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study examined whether individuals with consistently normal liver enzyme levels are protected from alcohol-related liver disease and investigated whether heavy drinking increases liver disease risk independent of normal biomarker status.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study using Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2002-2019), including 19,035 participants aged ≥40 years who maintained normal liver enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase ≤40 μ/L, alanine aminotransferase ≤40 μ/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤63 μ/L for men and ≤35 μ/L for women) across multiple examinations conducted between 2002 and 2008. Participants were categorized as abstainers (≤1 time/mo), moderate drinkers (≤2 times/wk), and heavy drinkers (≥3 times/wk). Primary outcomes included incident liver disease identified using diagnostic codes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), with age-stratified analyses performed.
resultsHeavy drinkers demonstrated a significantly higher risk of liver disease than abstainers (HR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40 to 2.14), whereas moderate drinkers showed no significant association (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.19). Consistent patterns emerged for middle-aged adults (40-69 years), with attenuated effects among participants aged ≥70 years. When alcoholic liver disease was analyzed specifically, both moderate (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.58) and heavy drinkers (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.09 to 3.91) exhibited significantly increased hazards.
conclusionsDespite normal liver enzyme levels, heavy alcohol consumption was associated with a significantly increased risk of liver disease. These findings challenge current reactive screening paradigms relying solely on biomarker abnormalities and support proactive alcohol counseling regardless of enzyme results. More sensitive strategies are needed for early detection of alcohol-related liver injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.