Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612818›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Causal evidence for a domain-specific role of left superior frontal sulcus in human perceptual decision-making.

Miguel Barretto-Garcia, Marcus Grueschow, Marius Moisa, Rafael Polania, Christian C Ruff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel Barretto-Garcia *Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-7859
Marcus Grueschow *Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marius MoisaZurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-3383
Rafael PolaniaDecision Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-6806
Christian C RuffZurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-2364

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 105314_152891Swiss National Science Foundation 51NF40_ 144609Swiss National Science Foundation CRSII3_141965Swiss National Science Foundation NCCR Affective Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals can flexibly choose their actions based on different information, ranging from objective states of the environment (e.g., apples are bigger than cherries) to subjective preferences (e.g., cherries are tastier than apples). Whether the brain instantiates these different choices by recruiting either specialised or shared neural circuitry remains debated. Specifically, domain-general accounts of prefrontal cortex (PFC) function propose that prefrontal areas flexibly process either perceptual or value-based evidence depending on what is required for the present choice, whereas domain-specific theories posit that PFC sub-areas, such as the left superior frontal sulcus (SFS), selectively integrate evidence relevant for perceptual decisions. Here, we comprehensively test the functional role of the left SFS for choices based on perceptual- and value-based evidence, by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with a behavioural paradigm, computational modelling, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Confirming predictions by a sequential sampling model, we show that TMS-induced excitability reduction of the left SFS selectively changes the processing of decision-relevant perceptual information and associated neural processes. In contrast, value-based decision-making and associated neural processes remain unaffected. This specificity of SFS function is evident at all levels of analysis (behavioural, computational, and neural, including functional connectivity), demonstrating that the left SFS causally contributes to evidence integration for perceptual but not value-based decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFrontal LobePerceptionPrefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultdrift-diffusion modelhumanleft superior frontal sulcusneuroscienceperceptual choicetranscranial magnetic stimulationvalue-based choice

Identifiers

PMID41612818
PMCPMC12858167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.