ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2026
Decision-Making Process of Healthcare Providers Regarding Catheterization Method: A Nationwide Survey Study.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe decision on which catheterization method to prescribe should be made on an individual basis, considering each patient's individual needs and circumstances. However, the current decision-making process regarding assisted bladder drainage might not be transparent or standardized.
objectivesThe aim of the present study was to explore and compare the decision-making processes of Dutch healthcare providers regarding the choice of catheterization method and relevant bladder management. This information is crucial in the empowerment of patient involvement and the development of a catheter decision aid. DESIGN &
methodsWe conducted a nationwide survey study including urologists, rehabilitation doctors, physician assistants, and specialized (continence)nurses. A 12-question survey was distributed regarding the decision-making process, including questions about treatment options discussed and factors upon which healthcare providers base their decisions.
resultsA total of 108 healthcare providers responded (response rate 36%). The majority were (continence)nurses or urologists and worked in a hospital. (Continence)nurses were least often involved in the decision-making, and when involved, 53% did not discuss potential other treatment options for the underlying causes of impaired bladder emptying. Most healthcare providers base their decision on the patient characteristics.
conclusionWe observed differences in the decision-making process between the healthcare providers. Implementing shared decision-making can lead to more effective collaboration between the patient and healthcare provider when selecting the most appropriate type of bladder management. This could be achieved through comprehensive training supplemented by a validated decision aid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.