ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
The Regularized Horseshoe for Covariate Selection Improves Convenience and Predictive Performance in Population PK/PD Models.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Regularized Horseshoe for Covariate Selection Improves Convenience and Predictive Performance in Population PK/PD Models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce the Regularized Horseshoe (RHS) in the context of covariate selection for population PK/PD models. Unlike stepwise approaches which are commonly used in this context, the RHS can simultaneously assess all possible parameter-covariate relationships in a single model fit by leveraging the fact that such relationships are usually sparse in practice. Furthermore, the RHS avoids the over-estimation of effect sizes that commonly occurs with stepwise approaches and avoids overfitting by averaging over the posterior uncertainty of possible parameter-covariate relationships. This leads to improved predictive performance on held-out data. We first give an overview of common covariate selection methods for population PK/PD modeling, then we define the RHS and provide intuition for how the method works. We then provide Stan code and a set of hyperparameters applicable to general population PK/PD models that can readily be applied by practitioners. Using an extensive simulation study, the beneficial properties of the RHS are illustrated and compared to popular covariate selection methods that are commonly used on population PK/PD models. Lastly, we compare the RHS to other commonly used methods on four real-world PK/PD datasets and illustrate its superior predictive performance on held-out data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.