ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Influence of leukocyte adhesion on partitioning of healthy and diabetic red blood cells at vascular bifurcations.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorheological changes associated with diabetes include alteration in red blood cell (RBC) deformability, shape, and volume, and an increased number of adhered leukocytes (white blood cells [WBCs]). How such changes affect RBC distribution in capillary vessel networks is not fully known. Here, we undertake a 3D high-fidelity computational study of diabetic and healthy RBC partitioning in vascular bifurcations without and with an adherent WBC. We predict that without a WBC, the difference between healthy and diabetic RBC partitioning is small but subtle. While both exhibit disproportionate but regular partitioning, the sigmoid curves depicting diabetic RBCs could become concave-up. An adherent WBC is shown to cause significant asymmetry with RBCs, exhibiting reverse partitioning when it is located closer to the flow-dominant branch and highly disproportionate regular partitioning when it is located closer to the non-dominant branch. The effect of a WBC is more pronounced on diabetic RBCs. Using numerical data and a reduced-order theoretical model, it is found that such asymmetry in RBC partitioning strikingly differs from WBC-induced asymmetry in the flow-rate partitioning-the adhesion of a WBC is shown to increase the flow fraction in the flow-dominant daughter vessel. Interesting differences are also predicted for time-dependent partitioning: Without the WBC, partitioning data of healthy cells show more temporal scatter than for diabetic cells. This trend is then reversed and increased by severalfold with the WBC present. Physical mechanisms underlying these differences are elucidated using diabetic and healthy RBC flow patterns and their interaction with the WBC. Additionally, we predict that the presence of a WBC can cause flow reversal in the non-dominant branch for certain pressure conditions, a phenomenon not observed without the WBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.