ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2026
Combined Neuroprotective Effects of N,N-Dimethyltryptamine and Ventral Root Reimplantation Following Spinal Root Avulsion in Rats.
Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, no effective treatment exists for injuries at the interface between the CNS/PNS, largely due to their complex pathophysiology and the limited efficacy of single-target therapies. To address this challenge, we investigated a novel combinatorial therapeutic strategy integrating surgical VRR with fibrin sealant biopolymer (FSB) and DMT in a rat model of ventral root avulsion VRA. DMT was extracted from Mimosa tenuiflora roots and structurally characterized using standard analytical methods. Adult female Lewis rats underwent unilateral L4-L6 VRA and received daily DMT treatment (1, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg; i.p) for 2 weeks to determine the optimal therapeutic dose. Subsequently, the identified optimal DMT dose was combined with VRR, and animals were evaluated 2 weeks post-injury. Outcome measures encompassed quantitative assessments of neuronal survival, glial reactivity, synaptic preservation, and differential gene expression of neurotrophic factors (GDNF, FGF-2, VGF-A) and anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL). Extracted DMT met all structural and analytical criteria for experimental use. Proximal axotomy led to substantial MN loss (78%), accompanied by pronounced glial reactivity and synaptic detachment. DMT at 1 mg/kg yielded the strongest neuroprotective profile, significantly enhancing MN survival, reducing glial reactivity, and preserving pre-synaptic boutons. Notably, these effects were further potentiated when DMT treatment was combined with VRR. Moreover, the combined VRR + DMT therapy significantly upregulated GDNF expression, indicating a synergistic effect on neurotrophic support. Overall, our findings suggest that DMT is a promising neuroprotective agent for treating MN degeneration following CNS/PNS interface injuries, particularly when integrated into a combinatorial therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.