ReviewPublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)
Vaccination Coverage and Factors Associated With Incomplete Vaccination Schedules in Children Under 5 in a Peripheral Area of the Federal District of Brazil.
Review in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate vaccination coverage (VC) and analyze the factors associated with the incomplete vaccination schedule (IVS) in children under 5 years of age in two Basic Health Units in the Federal District of Brazil.
designA cross-sectional study. SAMPLE: The study included 162 children in two Basic Health Units; 54.94% were male, and all were under 5 years of age. MEASUREMENTS: Guardians were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, and their vaccination booklets were photographed. VC was estimated and prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated using Poisson regression analysis.
resultsTwenty percent of the children had an IVS. None of the vaccines evaluated reached the VC considered correct in terms of age and interval between doses. Factors associated with IVS were age under 2 years (adjusted PR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.53-4.24), difficulties arising from the COVID-19 pandemic (adjusted PR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.51-4.86) and a negative response when asked whether all vaccines were administered in the same location (adjusted PR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.13-3.44).
conclusionsA high proportion of children presented IVS, associated with factors such as age, lack of continuity of vaccination in the same location and difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.