Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612497›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2026

Adherence to dietary recommendations according to the General Dietary Behavior Inventory (GDBI) and its association with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters among young, healthy and normal weight women.

Nadja Knoll-Pientka, Dorina Schils, Katrin Mantwill, Hannah Dinse, Eva-Maria Skoda, Alexander Bäuerle, Martin Teufel, Lars Libuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadja Knoll-PientkaClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Nadja.knoll@uni-due.de.
Dorina SchilsClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Katrin MantwillClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hannah DinseClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eva-Maria SkodaClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Alexander BäuerleClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin TeufelClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lars LibudaFaculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Nutrition, Consumption and Health, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe General Dietary Behavior Inventory (GDBI) is a low effort instrument with only 16 items to assess the general dietary behavior based on the dietary recommendations of the World Health Organization and the German Nutrition Society. In an online survey with a convenience sample, higher total GDBI scores indicating healthier dietary behavior were associated with a lower body mass index (BMI).

aimSince mean value of the self-reported BMI in that sample was in the overweight range, the aim of the current study was to examine the adherence to dietary recommendations using the GDBI in a sample of young and healthy women at the lower normal BMI range.

methodsIn total, 63 women aged 22.2 ± 2.2 years with a mean BMI of 20.4 ± 1.0 kg/m2 were included in this study. Body composition was determined using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). GDBI sum score and single item scores were compared with those of the validation study. Spearman correlations were calculated between the GDBI sum score and age, BMI, waist circumference (WC), and BIA parameters.

resultsThe mean GDBI score of 55.76 ± 6.46 in this sample was similar to that of the validation study. Regarding single items, the most pronounced difference compared with the validation study was found for the scores of item 2 indicating lower consumption of animal products in the current study. However, this item was not concordant with all further items. The GDBI sum score correlated with age, but neither with BMI nor WC nor any BIA parameter.

conclusionIn conclusion, other than expected we did not find a higher GDBI score compared with that of the validation study. Moreover, in this homogenous, healthy sample of young women at the lower normal BMI range, healthier dietary behavior as indicated by higher GDBI scores does not explain differences in BMI or body composition.

trial registrationThe study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00030472). Date of registration: October 10th, 2022, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Anorexia nervosaBody compositionDietary behaviorDOSEDE-QGDBI

Identifiers

PMID41612497
PMCPMC12924241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.