ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026
Implementation and evaluation of a peer-to-peer support program in oncology: study protocol for the PaRole Onco France model.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06817655 (Implementation and Evaluation of Peer Support in Oncology in France), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation and Evaluation of Peer Support in Oncology in France : a Multisite Participatory Action Research - Adaptation and Transfer in France of the Quebec PAROLE ONCO Research Program
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients as Co-Researchers in Oncology: A Qualitative Exploration of Participatory Governance.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeer support interventions in oncology have shown potential benefits for patients, including reduced psychological distress, improved empowerment, and enhanced care experience. However, the integration of Accompanying Patients (APs), trained individuals with personal experience of cancer into clinical teams remains variable, and the mechanisms underlying their impact are not fully understood. In France, although peer support initiatives are emerging, they often lack structure, evaluation, and coordination. Building on the PAROLE-Onco model developed in Quebec, this study aims to adapt, implement, and evaluate a structured peer-support program within the French healthcare system.
methodsThis study will use a mixed-methods, multiple-case design across ten oncology units with four organizational contexts. Quantitative data will be collected through validated questionnaires administered at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months for patients, or at inclusion, 1 month and 30 months for APs and healthcare professionals. Outcomes include quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), psychological well-being (HADS), empowerment (CASE-Cancer), care experience (PPE-15), patient-professional relationship (CADICEE), and professional perceptions of APs integration. Qualitative data will be gathered through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observations of meetings, and document analysis. This will explore the experiences of patients, APs, and professionals; the organizational adaptations and, the ethical and professional considerations associated with the program. Implementation fidelity, contextual adaptations, and stakeholders’ engagement will be systematically assessed. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an in-depth understanding of the integration processes and impacts of peer-support interventions in oncology care. By examining both patient-centered outcomes and organizational dynamics, it aims to identify key factors that facilitate sustainable integration of APs into clinical practice. Findings will inform strategies for scaling up and adapting peer-to-peer support programs across diverse healthcare settings, contributing to the strengthening of patient partnership and participatory approaches in cancer care.
trial registrationTrial is registered under Clinical Trails Registry – France (NCT06817655), registered on 10th February 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.