ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Trapped and traumatised: a scoping review of the psychological sequelae of entrapment following motor vehicle collision.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are a significant public health challenge, resulting in substantial mortality and morbidity. Entrapment occurs in 12-33% of all MVCs and is associated with greater injury severity, longer on-scene time, and increased mortality. However, the psychological consequences of entrapment remain poorly characterised.
objectivesThis scoping review seeks to establish the current understanding of the psychological sequelae of entrapment following MVCs and draws on insights from related fields of study in order to inform future research and clinical practice.
methodsA scoping review was undertaken following established methodological guidance. Searches were completed on NHS Knowledge and Library Hub, Proquest, and Ovid. Eligible studies reporting psychological outcomes in casualties trapped following MVCs were included, with no restrictions to publication date. Secondary searches were also undertaken to explore psychological outcomes in the related contexts of MVCs more generally and entrapment in non-MVC settings, with salient findings presented to contextualise the primary search within more established literature.
resultsSeven studies were included from the primary search. One additional study from the secondary searches was included in the primary research discussion due to a high degree of specificity to that topic. No study directly compared psychological outcomes in trapped versus non-trapped casualties. Reported experiences highlighted themes such as perceived threat to life, loss of control and the importance of supportive human contact. Some individuals experienced clinically significant mental health outcomes including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Acute Stress Disorder (ASD), anxiety, and depression. Secondary evidence supports the likelihood of increased psychological morbidity associated with MVC-entrapment.
conclusionDirect evidence on the psychological sequelae of MVC-entrapment is limited. Available findings suggest entrapment may heighten psychological risk through a range of factors, but prospective cohort studies comparing trapped vs non-trapped MVC casualties are needed to determine causal pathways. Further research should also explore rescue-based interventions such as facilitated self-extrication and deployment of extrication buddies, as well as appropriate trauma-informed psychological interventions in the immediate hospital setting and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.