ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
Radiation-induced severe lymphopenia predicts distant metastasis in rectal cancer: dosimetric implications for immune-sparing radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune-sparing radiotherapy in solid tumors: radiation-induced lymphopenia, circulating immune-cell dose, and biomarker-guided optimization of radioimmunotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLymphopenia is a frequent complication of pelvic radiotherapy and may impair systemic immune surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of acute severe lymphopenia (ASL) in rectal cancer and to identify dosimetric predictors relevant to immune-sparing radiotherapy.
methodsPatients with non-metastatic rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical variables, serum biomarkers (CEA and NLR), lymphocyte counts, and pelvic bone marrow dosimetry were analyzed. Associations between ASL, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and dosimetric metrics were assessed using multivariable models.
resultsA total of 161 patients were included, with 69.6% developing ASL. Patients with ASL had inferior 3-year DMFS (72.6% vs. 84.7%; p = 0.034), and ASL remained an independent predictor of poorer DMFS (p = 0.027). ECOG performance status ≥ 1 (p = 0.005), clinical N2 stage (p = 0.016), and baseline CEA > 5 ng/mL (p = 0.041) were also associated with worse DMFS, while adjuvant chemotherapy was protective (p < 0.001). Predictors of ASL included lower baseline absolute lymphocyte count (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.93 per 0.1 × 10⁹/L increase; p < 0.001), higher clinical T stage (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01–5.56; p = 0.046), and greater low-dose irradiation to the lower pelvis—V5 (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11 per 1% increase; p = 0.005), for which the optimal predictive cut-off was 88%.
conclusionASL was associated with increased risk of distant metastasis. As baseline immunity and disease burden are non-modifiable, minimizing lower pelvic V5 using as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)–based planning constraints may help reduce ASL risk and support immune-sparing radiotherapy in rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.