ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2026
Computing double-pushout graph transformation rules and atom-to-atom maps from KEGG RCLASS data.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extension of partial atom-to-atom maps: uniqueness and algorithms.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026Article
- SynRXN: An Open Benchmark and Curated Dataset for Computational Reaction Modeling.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtom-to-atom maps play an important role in many applications. However, they are often difficult to obtain. The KEGG reaction database does not provide atom-to-atom maps for its reactions and instead offers a description of local changes for pairs of reactant and product molecules in terms of so-called RCLASSes. Developed for classification purposes, RCLASS data are difficult to use for purposes such as the construction of atom-to-atom maps or reaction rules. DPO graph transformation rules, on the other hand, work as a convenient and efficient representation, particularly for these applications. The RCLASS data can be understood as collections of local graph patterns in the reactants and products of a reaction, together with partial correspondences of atoms. The problem of converting RCLASS data into DPO rules, therefore, is a special case of the graph reconstruction problem, which consists of inferring a graph from a collection of subgraphs.
resultsWe developed laveau, a tool that computes explicit DPO rules from KEGG reactions and RCLASS data. The algorithm proceeds stepwise, starting with a translation of individual RDM codes, specifically developed by the KEGG database, into equivalent RDM pattern graphs. Multiple RDM pattern graphs for the same RCLASS are then combined based on their embeddings into the reactant and product molecules, observing certain consistency conditions. In the final step, these combined pairwise patterns are merged into a pair of subgraphs of reactants and products, respectively. If RCLASSes connecting all pairs of reactant and product molecules are available, the complete reaction center(s) is/are contained in the union of these subgraphs. The atom-to-atom map inherited from the RDM codes then defines a DPO transformation rule. Application of these rules to the reactants then yields complete atom-to-atom maps (AAMs). Starting from 3195 RCLASSes, laveau generates a total of 1232 DPO rules and 1594 AAMs.
conclusionsThe laveau software makes it possible to extract local atom-to-atom maps from the RCLASSes of the KEGG database, covering a large set of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The results are made available in the form of DPO rules for use in atom-level models of metabolic networks, filling a crucial gap in the available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.