ArticleBMC medical education2026
Where do we go from here? Evaluating the effectiveness of a nursing MOOC over six years.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMassive open online courses (MOOCs) have transformed global education, yet their long-term effectiveness and evolving learner engagement remain underexplored. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate a nursing MOOC over six years, examining learner engagement, identifying distinct learner profiles, and assessing changes across different developmental stages to inform future MOOC design.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 4171 completers of the Medical Nursing MOOC on a Chinese MOOC platform, covering eleven semesters from 2018 to 2023. Latent profile analysis (LPA) categorized learners based on unit test scores, and profile distributions were compared across the MOOC's developmental stages.
resultsThe Medical Nursing MOOC attracted 69,642 registrants with a 5.99% completion rate. Among the 4171 individuals who completed the course, latent profile analysis identified six distinct learner types, demonstrating significant differences in overall learning effect (H = 2823.604, P < 0.001). The chi-squared analysis revealed significant differences between the proportions of the six profiles regarding MOOC developmental stages (χ
conclusionFindings highlight the evolving role of MOOCs in nursing education. Despite challenges in long-term engagement, the increasing proportion of highly engaged learners and declining dropout rates indicate growing effectiveness and sustainability. These insights provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing MOOC design and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.