ArticleBMC health services research2026
Just culture and restorative just culture in healthcare settings: a scoping review of interventions, activities, factors and outcomes.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJust culture and, more recently, restorative just culture interventions are increasingly recognised as nonpunitive approaches to the reporting of incidents in which healthcare professionals trust that they will receive fair treatment and support. However, despite this recognition, evidence concerning the range of interventions, implementation strategies and factors for successful outcomes supported by systematic approaches remains limited. This review sought to address this gap.
methodsWe searched PubMed, HBE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase and grey literature from January 2000 to December 2024. We included peer-reviewed studies or quality improvement reports of any design and used an iterative, inductive approach to thematically categorise the data supplemented with descriptive statistics.
resultsWe analysed 36 interventions across six thematic categories, which were a mix of just culture or restorative just culture interventions or existing safety interventions used to operationalise these approaches. Barriers and enablers to implementation included system improvements and accountability, a safe and supportive culture, leadership support, engagement and participation, organisational influences and external influences. Seven outcomes were identified: knowledge and confidence, communication and engagement in incident reporting, leadership engagement and support, shift towards a just, learning and safety culture, continuous improvement in processes, impact on patient safety outcomes and organisational benefits. A challenge was found in identifying the specific activities and factors contributing to the success of the interventions.
conclusionsThe interventions identified in this review are reflective of just culture and restorative just culture as a growing area in terms of quality and safety and incident management practices. The results suggest a number of preexisting safety interventions that can be used to operationalise these approaches, with restorative culture adding a further step of addressing the harm to the healthcare professional, crossing the boundaries of traditional patient safety functions to include Human Resources, Organisational Development and even Union functions. This review progresses the study of just culture and restorative just culture from a traditional quality improvement approach to implementation science. However, further work is needed to refine definitions to capture the extent and progress of preexisting work in this field and to develop implementation methodologies that identify relationships between interventions, barriers, enablers, outcomes and systematic methods for implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.