ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026
A decision-tree model to evaluate the impacts of workforce investments aimed at strengthening emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) facilities in Burundi.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHuman resources for health (HRH) in low- and middle income countries (LMICs) are often allocated irrationally based on normative policies that ignore service delivery patterns and health outcomes, failing to account for costs and expected benefits. To help Burundi rationalise scarce resources and tackle health system inefficiencies, we developed four workforce investment scenarios aimed at strengthening emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) facilities and predicted the costs and benefits associated with these investment proposals over the 2025-2030 timeframe.
methodsWe documented across the 112 Burundian EmONC facilities the available human resources and collated annual data on deliveries and obstetric complications covering 2021. Using the Workload Indicator for Staffing Needs (WISN) methodology, we estimated for each facility the workforce deficit and developed four EmONC workforce investment scenarios; no investment, a partial workforce package, and full workforce packages targeted at either all facilities or a select group of priority facilities. A decision tree model helped to predict the costs per maternal death averted.
resultsA budget of US$ 11.1 million is required to fully address workforce gaps across the 104 facilities with shortages over five years, potentially saving 532 maternal lives each year. Given budget constraints, Burundi could focus on the 24 priority facilities with an investment of US$ 3.27 million or allocate US$ 3.18 million to supply two midwives across the 104 facilities. These investments are projected to avert 163 and 267 maternal deaths annually, respectively. The partial workforce investment is more cost-effective with an expected expenditure of US$ 2380.58 for each maternal life saved.
conclusionEfforts to invest across the EmONC network if simply based on assigned B/CEmONC status may poorly allocate scarce resources. If resources are limited, investing in two additional midwives across the 104 EmONC facilities would be more efficient than implementing a full workforce package. However, health benefits of any workforce investment significantly depend on an enabling environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.