Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612306›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

The effect of deductibles on healthcare expenditure: new evidence for Switzerland.

Stefan Felder, Stefan Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan Felder *Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Peter Merian-Weg 6, Basel, 4002, Switzerland. stefan.felder@unibas.ch.
Stefan Meyer *Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Peter Merian-Weg 6, Basel, 4002, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Switzerland's statutory health insurance system is compulsory, but offers consumers a choice between different deductible levels. Faced with a steady growth of healthcare expenditure (HCE), both chambers of the national parliament recently voted in favour of increasing the minimum deductible from CHF 300 to CHF 500. In this study, we use claims data from the largest Swiss health insurer to compare the per capita HCE of adults who voluntarily chose different deductible levels. Specifically, we focus on individuals with the minimum deductible (CHF 300), the proposed new minimum (CHF 500), and the maximum deductible (CHF 2500). Applying matching and regression analysis, we find an 11% and 27% reduction in HCE, respectively, of the higher deductibles. The effects are stronger for outpatient care and drugs and weaker for inpatient and long-term care. If the minimum deductible increases to CHF 500 and insurers pass through the estimated CHF 900 reduction in per capita HCE, the average consumer will benefit by CHF 772. No consumer will lose because the maximum additional copayment is capped at CHF 200.

Indexed as

Deductibles and CoinsuranceHealth ExpendituresInsurance, HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleSwitzerlandChoice of insurance contractsDeductiblesMoral-hazard effect

Identifiers

PMID41612306
PMCPMC12931060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.