Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612304›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Translation, psychometric assessment, and adaptation of the state empathy scale among healthcare students.

Inger Hilde Hagen, Vigdis Schnell Husby, Kjersti Natvig Antonsen, Randi Stokke, Elise Kvalsund Bårdsgjerde, Lars Aune Svarthaug, Marit Stuedahl, Susan Saga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inger Hilde HagenDepartment of Health Sciences in Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Postbox 1517, Aalesund, 6025, Norway. Inger.h.hagen@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7996-2274
Vigdis Schnell HusbyDepartment of Health Sciences in Ålesund, Ålesund, Norway and Orthopaedic Department, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim University Hospital, Post-box 3250 Torgarden, Trondheim, 7006, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-607X
Kjersti Natvig AntonsenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7569-5727
Randi StokkeDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Postbox 191, Gjøvik, 2802, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-2364
Elise Kvalsund BårdsgjerdeDepartment of Health Sciences in Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Postbox 1517, Aalesund, 6025, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-0840
Lars Aune SvarthaugDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Postbox 191, Gjøvik, 2802, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0071-433X
Marit StuedahlDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6995-5206
Susan SagaDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-1102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding patients’ experiences, opinions, and feelings is essential for health professionals to assess patients’ real needs and provide optimal treatment. Teaching and assessing healthcare students’ empathy is challenging in an educational context. The English measurement instrument State Empathy Scale, based on the theory of empathy, measures state empathy during message processing and was found to be suitable for measuring state empathy among healthcare students.

methodsThis study aimed to translate and adapt the State Empathy Scale into Norwegian and assess its psychometric properties among healthcare students. The study was conducted among healthcare students at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Participants consisted of 189 students from various healthcare study programs who took part in a VR 360° video learning design conducted during Trauma Week. The translation process followed international guidelines and included independent forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, and expert committee review. Minor adaptations were made to tailor the scale to the healthcare education context. The revised version was field-tested among healthcare students and assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsSmall adjustments to a healthcare student context were made, and the measurement instrument demonstrated good face/content validity. The Norwegian version of the State Empathy Scale’s structural validity was evaluated. It supported a three-factor structure similar to the original English instrument but with three removed items. The measurement instrument demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity and internal consistency.

conclusionsThe translated, adapted, and validated State Empathy Scale 9 - Norwegian version (SES9-No) is reliable and valid for assessing empathy among Norwegian healthcare students. This tool can facilitate the development and evaluation of empathy training programs, ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care.

Indexed as

EmpathyStudents, Health OccupationsAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleNorwayPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsYoung AdultAdaptationConfirmatory factor analysisHealthcare studentsPsychometric evaluationState empathy scaleTranslationValidation

Identifiers

PMID41612304
PMCPMC12918513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.